Modelagem de valor agregado e o poder do pensamento magico
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Referências
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION. Standards for educational and psychological measurement. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1999.
BIRD, S. et al. Performance indicators: good, bad and ugly. J. Royal Statistical Society A, London, v. 168, n. 1, p. 1-27, 2005.
BRAUN, H. I. Using student progress to evaluate teachers: a primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service, 2005.
BRIGGS, D.; WEEKS, J.; WILEY, E. The sensitivity of value-added modeling to the creation of a vertical score scale. Education Finance and Policy, Cambridge, v. 4, n. 4, p. 384-414, 2008.
BRIGGS, D. ; DOMINIGUE, B. Due diligence and the evaluation of teachers: a review of the value-added analysis underlying the effectiveness rankings of LAUSD teachers by the Los Angeles Times. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center, 2011.
CAMPBELL, D. Assessing the impact of planned social change. [S.l.]: the Public Affairs Center; Hanover, New Hampshire, USA : Dartmouth College, 1976.
CORCORAN, S. Can teachers be evaluated by their students’ test scores? Should they be? The use of value-added measures of teacher effectiveness in policy and practice. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform, 2010.
GOLDHABER, D. Teachers matter, but effective teacher policies are elusive. In: LADD, H.; FISKE, E. (Ed.). Handbook of Research in Education Finance and Policy. New York: Routledge, 2008.
GOLDHABER, D.; HANSEN, M. Is it just a bad class? Assessing the long-term stability of estimated teacher performance. [S.l]: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 2012. (Working Paper 73).
HARRIS, D. Value-added measures in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2011.
HILL, H.; CHARALAMBOUS, Y. ; KRAFT, M. When rater reliability is not enough: teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 41, n. 2, p. 56-64, 2012.
KOEDEL, C.; BETTS, J. Does student sorting invalidate VAMs of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, 2009. (U. of Missouri Working Paper 09-02).
LADD, H. F. Teacher Effects: what do we know? In: DUNCAN, G.; SPILLANE, J. (Ed.). Teacher quality: broadening and deepening the debate. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 2008. Available from: .
LINN, R. Accountability models. In: FUHRMAN, S.; ELMORE, R. (Ed.). Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. New York: Teachers College Press, 2004.
MADAUS, G.; RUSSELL, M.; HIGGINS, J. The paradoxes of high-stakes testing. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2009.
MCCAFFREY, D. et al. The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy, Cambridge, MA, v. 4, n. 4, p. 572-606, 2009.
MESSICK, S. Validity. In: LINN, R. (Ed.). Educational Measurement. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1989. p. 13-103.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Getting value out of value-added. H. I. Braun, N. Chudowsky and J. Koenig (Eds.). Washington, DC: [s.n.] , 2010.
NEWTON, X. A. et al. Value-added modeling of teacher effectiveness: An exploration of stability across models and contexts. Education Policy Analysis Archives, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 23, 2010.
PAPAY, J. P. Different tests, different answers: the stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 48, n. 1, p. 163-193, 2011.
REARDON, S. ; RAUDENBUSH, S. Assumptions of value-added models for estimating school effects. Education Finance and Policy, Cambridge, MA, v. 4, n. 4, 2009.
ROTHSTEIN, J. Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: selection on observables and unobservables. Education Finance and Policy, Cambridge, MA, v.4, n. 3, p. 537-571, 2009.
ROTHSTEIN, J. Teacher quality in educational production: tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly J. of Economics, [S.l.], v. 125, n. 1, p. 175-214, 2010.
ROTHSTEIN, R., JACOBSEN, R.; WILDER, T. Grading education: Getting accountability right. New York: Teachers College Press, 2008.
RUBIN, D. Which ifs have causal answers? J. American Statistical Association, [S.l.], v. 81, p. 961-962, 1986.
SASS, T. R. The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy. Brief 4. [S.l.]: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 2008.
SCHNEIDER, B. et al. Estimating causal effects: using experimental and observational designs. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2007.
SUNDERMAN, G. (Ed.). Holding NCLB accountable: achieving accountability, equity & school reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press., 2008.
ZUSNE, L.; JONES, W. Anomalistic Psychology: a Study of Magical Thinking. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1989. Available from: . Accessed: 4th February, 2012.
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Programa de Apoio às Publicacoes Cientificas (AED) do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e tecnologico (CNPq), Ministerio da Educação (MEC), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)
Revista chancelada pela Unesco. Revista parceira da Associação Brasileira de Avaliação Educacional (ABAVE)