Percepción de los estudiantes sobre el uso de las plataformas LMS y los teléfonos inteligentes durante la pandemia Covid-19

Ricardo-Adán Salas-Rueda, Gustavo De-La-Cruz-Martínez, Ricardo Castañeda-Martínez, Clara Alvarado-Zamorano

Resumo


El objetivo de esta investigación cuantitativa es analizar el impacto de las plataformas LMS y los teléfonos inteligentes por medio de la ciencia de datos. Los participantes son 302 estudiantes de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México que cursaron la preparatoria (n = 208, 68.87%) y la Licenciatura en Trabajo Social (n = 94, 31.13%) durante el ciclo escolar 2020. Los resultados del aprendizaje automático (regresión lineal) indican que las plataformas LMS y los teléfonos inteligentes influyen positivamente la motivación, satisfacción y asimilación del conocimiento. Asimismo, la ciencia de datos identifica 6 modelos predictivos sobre el uso de estas herramientas tecnológicas. Por último, la incorporación de las plataformas LMS y los teléfonos inteligentes en las actividades escolares permite construir nuevos espacios educativos durante la pandemia Covid-19.


Texto completo:

PDF (Español (España))

Referências


ALMOEATHER, R. Effectiveness of blackboard and edmodo in self-regulated learning and educational satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 21, n. 2, p. 126-140, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.728140. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/53991/728140. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

AKAY, E.; KORAL-GUMUSOGLU, E. The impact of learning management systems on students’ achievement in language exams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 21, n. 4, p. 206-222, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803410. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/57047/803410. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

BASAL, A.; YILMAZ, S.; TANRIVERDI, A.; SARI, L. Effectiveness of mobile applications in vocabulary teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 47-59, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6162. Disponible en: https://www.cedtech.net/article/effectiveness-of-mobile-applications-in-vocabulary-teaching-6162. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

CARROLL, R.; LINCOLN, J. Phyphox app in the physics classroom. The Physics Teacher, [College Park, MD], v. 58, p. 60-68, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0002393. Disponible en: https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/10.0002393?af=R&feed=most-recent. Acceso en: 8 nov. 2021.

CHUN-MING, C.; HAN-YANG, C. Use smartphones to measure Brewster’s angle. The Physics Teacher, [College Park, MD], v. 57, n. 2, p. 118-124, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5088478. Disponible en: https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.5088478. Acceso en: 12 nov. 2021.

CURRAN, V.; FLEET, L.; SIMMONS, K.; LANNON, H.; GUSTAFSON, D.; CHENFANG, W.; GARMSIRI, M.; WETSCH, L. Adoption and use of mobile learning in continuing professional development by health and human services professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, [S. l.], v. 39, n. 2, p. 76-85, 2019. DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000243. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30908401/. Acceso en: 23 nov. 2021.

ERGUL-SONMEZ, E.; KOC, M. Pre-service teachers’ lived experiences with taking courses through learning management systems: a qualitative study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 19, n. 2, p. 101-116, 2018. DOI: DOI:10.17718/tojde.415823. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/36573/415823. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

FOKIDES, E.; MASTROKOUKOU, A. Results from a study for teaching human body systems to primary school students using tablets. Contemporary Educational Technology, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 154-170, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.414808. Disponible en: https://www.cedtech.net/article/results-from-a-study-for-teaching-human-body-systems-to-primary-school-students-using-tablets-6216. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

GAMAGE, S.; AYRES, J. R.; BEHREND, M. B.; SMITH, E. J. Optimising moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, [S. l.], v. 6, p. 27-32, 2019. Disponible en: https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-019-0181. Acceso en: 5 dic. 2021.

GAMBOA-RODRÍGUEZ, F. Diseño de espacios colaborativos interactivos para el aprendizaje. In: ZUBIETA GARCÍA, J.; RAMA VITALE, C. (coord.). La educación a distancia en México: una nueva realidad universitaria. México: UNAM, 2015. p. 201-211.

GIROT, A.; GOY, N. A.; VILQUIN, A.; DELABRE, U. Studying ray optics with a smartphone. The Physics Teacher, [College Park, MD], v. 58, n. 2, p. 133-138, 2020. DOI: 10.1119/1.5144800. Disponible en: https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.5144800. Acceso en: 14 dic. 2021.

HOSSEINPOUR, N.; BIRIA, R.; REZVANI, E. Promoting academic writing proficiency of iranian EFL learners through blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 20, n. 4, p. 99-116, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640525. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/49972/640525. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

HOWLETT, G.; WAEMUSA, Z. Digital native/digital immigrant divide: EFL teachers’ mobile device experiences and practice. Contemporary Educational Technology, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 374-389, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.471007. Disponible en: https://www.cedtech.net/article/digital-native-digital-immigrant-divide-efl-teachers-mobile-device-experiences-and-practice-6228. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

KISSI, L.; DREESMANN, D. Plant visibility through mobile learning?: Implementation and evaluation of an interactive flower hunt in a botanic garden. Journal of Biological Education, [New York], v. 52, n. 4, p. 344-363, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1385506. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00219266.2017.1385506. Acceso en: 8 dic. 2021.

LAKARNCHUA, O.; BALME, S.; MATTHEWS, A. Insights from the implementation of a flipped classroom approach with the use of a commercial learning management system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 21, n. 3, p. 63-76, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.762027. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/55722/762027. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

PADMO, D.; IDRUS, O.; ARDIASIH, L. The utilization of mobile devices for improving access to online learning for distance education’s students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 20, n. 2, p. 147-161, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.557858. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/44835/557858. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

SPERNJAK, A.; SORGO, A. Differences in acquired knowledge and attitudes achieved with traditional, computer-supported and virtual laboratory biology laboratory exercises. Journal of Biological Education, [New York], v. 52, n. 2, p. 206-220, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1298532. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00219266.2017.1298532. Acceso en: 4 oct. 2021.

WILDAN, A.; CHEONG, B. H.; XIAO, K.; LIEW, O. W.; WAH NG, T. Growth measurement of surface colonies of bacteria using augmented reality. Journal of Biological Education, [New York], v. 54, n. 4, p. 419-432, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600571. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00219266.2019.1600571?journalCode=rjbe20. Acceso en: 18 oct. 2021.

XU, M.; WILLIAMS, J. P.; JIANJUN, G. An initial development and validation of a chinese technology teachers’ attitudes towards technology (TTATT) scale. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, [S. l.], v. 30, p. 937-950, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-019-09551-3. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-019-09551-3. Acceso en: 4 oct. 2021.

YANG, D. Instructional strategies and course design for teaching statistics online: perspectives from online students. International Journal of STEM Education, [S. l.], v. 4, p. 34-39, 2017. Disponible en: https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40594-017-0096-x. Acceso en: 18 oct. 2021.

YARAHMADZEHI, N.; GOODARZI, M. Investigating the role of formative mobile based assessment in vocabulary learning of pre-intermediate EFL learners in comparison with paper based assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, [Ankara], v. 21, n. 1, p. 181-196, 2020. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde/issue/52523/690390. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.

ZIYAD, H. Technology-mediated ELT writing: acceptance and engagement in an online Moodle course. Contemporary Educational Technology, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 4, p. 314-330, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6179. Disponible en: https://www.cedtech.net/article/technology-mediated-elt-writing-acceptance-and-engagement-in-an-online-moodle-course-6179. Acceso en: 9 jun. 2022.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22347/2175-2753v14i43.3661

Bookmark and Share


Direitos autorais 2022 Fundação Cesgranrio

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Principios Norteadores para o Avaliador

Guiding Principles for Evaluators American Evaluation Association (AEA)

Com o proposito de guiar o trabalho dos profissionais de avaliação e assegurar a etica de sua atuacao, a American Evaluation Association (AEA) - Associacao Profissional de Avaliadores - estabeleceu cinco principios norteadores aqui resumidos:

1.  Indagacao Sistematica, no que se refere à capacidade de coletar dados utilizando tecnicas apropriadas e comunicando metodos e abordagens com a devida transparencia para permitir acesso e critica.

2.  Competencia, no que se refere a demonstrar atuacao competente perante os envolvidos no processo avaliativo e desenvolver continuamente sua capacidade para alcancar o mais alto nivel de desempenho possivel.

3.  Integridade/Honestidade, no que se refere a assegurar honestidade e integridade ao longo de todo o processo avaliativo, negociando com os envolvidos e interessados na avaliação e buscando esclarecer e orientar procedimentos que venham provocar distorcoes ou indevidas utilizacoes.

4.  Respeito pelas pessoas, no que se refere ao respeito pela seguranca, dignidade e auto-valorizacao dos envolvidos no processo avaliativo, atuando sempre com etica profissional, evitando riscos e prejuizos que possam afetar os participantes para assegurar, o melhor possivel, o respeito às diferencas e o direito social de retorno dos resultados, aos envolvidos.

5.  Responsabilidade pelo bem estar geral e público, no que se refere a levar em consideracao a diversidade de interesses e valores que possam estar relacionados ao público em geral,buscando responder nao somente às expectativas mais imediatas, mas tambem às implicacoes e repercussoes mais amplas e, nesse sentido, disseminar a informacao sempre que necessario.

Indexado em:

  1. Miguilim - Diretório das revistas científicas eletrônicas brasileiras

  2. DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals

  3. EBSCO - Information Services

  4. Edubase

  5. Google Scholar

  6. Latindex - Sistema regional de información en línea para revistas científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal

  7. LivRe! - Portal do CNEN - Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear do Ministério de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação

  8. OEI - Organizacion de Estados Iberoamericanos (Madri, Espanha, CREDI)

  9. RCAAP - Repositorio Cientifico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal

  10. REDIB - Red Iberoamericana de Innovación y Conocimiento Científico

  11. Scopus - A maior base de dados de abstracts e citacao de literatura revisada por pares:periodicos cientificos, livros e anais

 

Scimago

SJR : Scientific Journal Rankings

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
  
  

Meta: Aval., Rio de Janeiro, ISSN 2175-2753.